Lindsey LoGraham Outraged

Hey Lindsey LoGraham, as to your statement today voicing your feigned outrage over the President’s circumvention of the WARN Act notifications not being delivered until after the election, I have a nasty reminder about your own circumvention of the Constitution. You bravely stated to FOX News today,

“You would have the executive unilaterally tell the private to ignore a congressional statute”.

It gets better: “Again, what kind of precedent would this set in the future? What would stop future presidents from ignoring laws that they don’t like?”

This is where I truly appreciate your courage for standing up and taking charge when the chief executive issues orders which are in direct violation of our Constitution and a usurpation of powers not granted in Article I Sect. II. A perfect example was your outrage over dear leaders’ unilateral decision to order air strikes into Libya and the assassinate of Ghadaffi, his ordering the DOJ not to enforce DOMA or current immigration laws well as his assassination list and frequent drone strikes into Yemen and Pakistan against which we have no declaration of war and have no authority to enter their sovereign airspace to deliver ordinance.

You pompous, arrogant, cowardly neocon ass! What about the NDAA which you vehemently supported? I believe your statement on the floor of the Senate was something to the effect of:

“What if they’re a US citizen and they ask for a lawyer? I’ll tell you what I will do; I’ll tell them to shut the hell up!”

Allow me to ask you something. What would stop a future administration from abusing this unconstitutional act?

Your ideological stance and tireless efforts on behalf of the NDAA qualifies as “High crimes and misdemeanors” and identifies you as one who should be impeached, stripped of your central government, self approved benefits, TRIED and imprisoned.

You’re support of an Act whose offending Sections would most closely resemble the Japanese internment camps. Notice something? I’ll even ensure that you are charged, tried before a jury of your peers, convicted and imprisoned.

In case you’re wondering who could possibly be considered a peer of yours; let me put your statist mind at ease. These peers would include your fellow criminals who also thought it to be within the enumerated powers to order the indefinite detainment of a US citizen without evidence, charge or trial.

These authoritarians also felt that the founders considered this long ago and foresaw that in the case of an unconstitutional, undeclared war, this would certainly be useful to the central government.

So, you will see Col. Allen West, Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio………

“In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”~Thomas Jefferson

I’m sure that you get the idea.